“Empowerment is not giving people power. They already have plenty of power – in the wealth of their knowledge and motivation – to do their jobs magnificently. We define empowerment as letting this power out.”
This is strictly for those who want LOTS OF MONEY….FAST. Period. precisely at this moment, you’re saying, “Yeah RIGHT… too good to be true!” Then just go here go go go go!!!!
http://www.tviexpress.com/santini1
Posting Pics Online? What Your Photos Say About You
Jeanna Bryner
Senior Writer
LiveScience.com jeanna Bryner
senior Writer
livescience.com – Mon Nov 9, 11:23 am ET
Those photos you post on Facebook could paint an accurate picture of your personality, new research on first impressions suggests.
And perhaps as expected, the more candid a shot the more nuances of your personality show through.
”In an age dominated by social media where personal photographs are ubiquitous, it becomes important to understand the ways personality is communicated via our appearance,” said study researcher Laura Naumann of Sonoma State University. “The appearance one portrays in his or her photographs has important implications for their professional and social life.”
With this information, there’s always the option of tweaking your image, and thus your personality to the outside world. “If you want potential employers or romantic suitors to see you as a warm and friendly individual, you should post pictures where you smile or are standing in a relaxed pose,” Naumann said.
Scientists have known physical appearance is important for first impressions and that such initial impressions can be hard to undo, particularly negative ones. Studies have shown judgments made at first glance of a CEO can predict his or her success. But until now little was known about how well people judged personality based on appearance and what physical factors are most important.
In the new study, 12 observers looked at full-body photos of 123 undergraduate students who they had never met before. Six observers viewed the students in a neutral pose and six saw the same students in a spontaneous pose.
The participants rated each photo on 10 personality traits: extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability, openness (open to experience), likability, self-esteem, loneliness, religiosity and political orientation.
To figure out accuracy of the judgments, the researchers compared the results with the posers’ self-ratings and ratings from three close friends.
For the controlled poses, the observers accurately judged extraversion and self-esteem. When participants looked at the naturally expressive shots, which revealed dynamic non-verbal cues, they were nearly spot-on, getting nine out of the 10 traits correct (everything but political orientation).
For instance, both the neutral and expressive photos garnered about a 70 percent success rate.
“Extraversion is one of those things that’s probably the easiest trait to judge,” Naumann told LiveScience. “Even without seeing whether someone is smiling or not people can pick that up.”
But when judging likeability, observers got it right on average for 55 percent of the photos with neutral poses and 64 percent of the expressive photos. Similar results were found for agreeableness, with participants judging correctly 45 percent of the time for neutral poses compared with 60 percent in the expressive images.
Beyond pure science, the researchers say the results, which will be detailed in the December issue of the journal Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, have practical implications.
For example, if you want to come off as an extravert, try to smile more, stand in energetic and less tense ways, and gear your overall appearance to look healthy (as opposed to sickly), neat and stylish, the study found. For those interested in seeming open to new experiences, it’d be best to show off a distinctive style of dressing rather than a healthy, neat appearance.
LiveScience.com chronicles the daily advances and innovations made in science and technology. We take on the misconceptions that often pop up around scientific discoveries and deliver short, provocative explanations with a certain wit and style. Check out our science videos, Trivia & Quizzes and Top 10s. Join our community to debate hot-button issues like stem cells, climate change and evolution. You can also sign up for free newsletters, register for RSS feeds and get cool gadgets at the LiveScience Store.
http://www.tviexpress.com/santini1
Humans can easily tap into their own imagination power and bring what they desire into physical reality; not only that, but we can imagine multiple futures for ourselves based on different plans of actions we can follow. To manifest desires, time is no longer a barrier when you tap into the power of vivid imagination. When the mind has a framework and a vision, it expects to realize it. You then bring into play what’s known as the Universal Law of Expectation.
What you expect to happen usually does. Why? Because your subconscious mind will manifest desires by bringing forth whatever you vividly imagine. Think ahead of time to make sure you will be completely comfortable with your goals if you actually achieved them. Think about the future impact it will have on your life, your family, and those close to you. You have great potential inside of you in the form of energy waiting to be unleashed.
Discover The Greatest Secrets Of The Mind And Reality That Will Get You Anything You Desire, Almost Like Magic! If you want to FINALLY experience the COMPLETE Manifestation of All the Miracles, Success, Wealth, Health, Love and Happiness that you have always dreamed of… then register as member of Mind Reality now!
Go here now to discover how to become a Mind Reality Member:
==> http://www.MindReality.com/specialoffer.html
http://www.tviexpress.com/santini1
From Mr. Wes Hopper: http://www.CreateSuccessSeminars.com/books.html
“Yes, you have a perfect right to be angry
at some injustice that has taken place in
your life, and you also have a right to the
stomach ulcers that inevitably follow. For
we are always dealing with law.”
Eric Butterworth
There is one great law that governs all our
affairs of life. It’s called “cause and effect.”
The way it works with our people relationships
is that what we put out comes back to us
multiplied.
So if someone commits an injustice on
us, that injustice will rebound on the
offender, multiplied. It’s their problem.
Now, we may have to deal with the effects
of the injustice on us. But how we respond
emotionally makes all the difference.
If we simply deal with it without adding our
emotional energy to it, it remains their
problem.
If we emotionally accept the injustice, by
choosing to get angry, or insulted, or
wounded, or revengeful at the offender,
it’s now our problem too. And our anger
shows up in our mind and body multiplied.
We get ulcers, headaches, indigestion,
insomnia and other physical problems
that let us know we’ve broken the law.
That’s why Jesus suggested that we
should forgive “seventy times seven”
times. Because he knew that when we
put out love and forgiveness, we get
love and forgiveness back.
Not necessarily from the same place we
gave it to, but who cares? As long as we
get lots of it!
That’s the law!
Massive Revolutionary Changes
by Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D.
I’ve just returned from Munich, Germany, where Claus Vogt and I addressed the 8th Annual Conference of Sicheres Geld subscribers.
Here are the highlights of my side of the presentation. (Claus will give you his side in a future issue).
Massive Revolutionary Changes
A few years ago, when we first began this journey together, we warned that the U.S. government was leading us to a future banking panic.
We warned about the housing bubble that was about to burst.
We told you about the giant monster of derivatives that could someday explode.
And we showed you how the U.S. real estate bust and the derivatives monster were likely to strike the largest financial institutions of Wall Street, threatening a meltdown in global financial markets.
Then, three years ago, we described the coming crisis in greater detail, naming the large financial institutions we believed were most likely to fail:
- Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, two of America’s largest investment banks
- Countrywide Financial and Fannie Mae, America’s largest mortgage lenders
- Washington Mutual, America’s largest savings and loan corporation
- Citigroup, America’s largest consumer ban
Virtually no one believed this was possible.
When we gave the story of the Citigroup failure to a reporter of a major business magazine, the editor nixed the story. When we told other banking experts that Citigroup was on the brink of failure, they laughed. When we told government officials, the company executives simply told them we were crazy.
As it turned out, the crisis was not less severe than we expected. Nor was it as severe as expected. Rather, the crisis was actually more severe — for two reasons.
First, in addition to the companies that we named as candidates for failure, several other giant companies that we had not named also went bankrupt or required a bailout.
The failed Wall Street firms included not only Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, but also Merrill Lynch.
The failed commercial banks included not only Citigroup, but also Bank of America.
The bankrupt institutions were not only in the U.S., but also in the U.K., Germany, and even Switzerland — Royal Bank of Scotland; IKB and Hypo Real Estate in Germany; and UBS in Switzerland.
They included not only banks and brokerage firms, but also the largest single insurance company in America, AIG.
But whether we named them ahead of time or not, the salient fact is that, in nearly every major financial industry — commercial banking, investment banking, consumer banking, brokerage, mortgage lending, and insurance — the companies that failed, or almost failed, were not small- or medium-sized. They weren’t the third largest or fourth largest. They were the single largest in the world.
Think about that: The world’s largest companies in every single sector of the financial industry. Failed. Bankrupt.
Now, fast-forward to today, November 7, 2009. Suddenly and miraculously, the same economists who told you this crisis could never happen are now telling you that this crisis is “over.” And the same government officials who scoffed at the notion of giant financial failures are claiming they have the final solution to those failures.
But the derivatives we warned you about are not gone. They are still there. Nor are the bad debts on the books of major banks. And most important, the government policies which created the crisis in the first place have not been modified or reduced. They have actually been accelerated, as we’ll demonstrate in a moment.
And therein lies the second reason the crisis is actually worse than we expected. With its deliberate policies, the U.S. government, along with governments here in Europe, have now transformed the Wall Street debt crisis into the Washington debt crisis.
They have transformed a crisis that was bankrupting individual institutions into a crisis that could threaten to bankrupt sovereign governments. Worst of all, they have converted a crisis of debt into a crisis of our currency.
This chart shows the monetary base of the United States. It represents the most basic form of money supply — cash currency in the coffers of U.S. banks plus their total reserves.
As long as this basic measure of money supply is growing at a moderate pace, you can generally expect stability in the U.S. dollar, gold, and other markets. There will be ups and downs, of course, and sometimes, due to other global events, those ups and downs could be sharp. But they will not turn the world upside down.
Indeed, this had been the pattern since World War II: relatively moderate expansion. Up until September of last year, when Lehman Brothers failed, it took the U.S. Federal Reserve a total of 5,012 days to double this measure.
But then, look what happened: Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke doubled the U.S. monetary base in 112 days. Not in 5,012 days as his predecessors had done — but in a meager 112 days! He accelerated the pace of bank reserve expansion by a factor of 45 to 1.
Imagine a crowded highway with most cars traveling at an average speed of 100 km per hour. Then imagine a new driver appearing on the scene with a jet-powered engine that accelerates to a supersonic speed of 4,500 km per hour. That’s the same magnitude of change Fed Chairman Bernanke has presided over.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is not just more of the same trend that we have witnessed over the decades. It’s a massive, revolutionary change in the entire structure of the U.S. economy.
Even in the most extreme circumstances of history, the Fed never pumped in this much money in such a short period of time.
For example, before the turn of the millennium, the Fed was afraid of a computer catastrophe at the banks caused by the widely publicized Y2K bug. So it rushed to provide liquidity to U.S. banks and increased the monetary base by $73 billion in three months. At the time, that was considered huge. But this time, Mr. Bernanke has increased the monetary base by over $1 trillion, or 14 times more!
Here’s another example: In the days following the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, the Federal Reserve rushed to flood the banks with liquid funds. That time, it added $40 billion in less than 14 days. However, Mr. Bernanke’s recent trillion-dollar deluge of money is twenty five times larger.
Here’s the most astounding fact of all: After the Y2K and 9/11 crises had passed, the Fed promptly reversed its money infusions. It pulled out the extra liquidity from the banking system.
But this time, Mr. Bernanke has done precisely the opposite. Since he doubled the currency and reserves at the nation’s banks with his 112-day money-printing frenzy in late 2008, he has thrown still more money into the pot. And late last month, the monetary base surged to new, all-time highs.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is not just more of the same trend that we have witnessed over the decades. It’s a massive, revolutionary change in the entire structure of the U.S. economy.
This is the elephant in the room — the situation that everyone knows is there, but no one wants to admit.
Now, let’s take a look at this same elephant from another perspective — the largest federal budget deficits in the history of mankind.
If the U.S. federal deficit were growing by 20 percent, 30 percent, or even as much as 50 percent, the pundits could have argued that it was just the continuation of a long-term trend, that it was simply more of the same.
But just in the last 12 months, the U.S. federal deficit has exploded from $454.8 billion in fiscal 2008 to $1.4 trillion in fiscal 2009. It has tripled in size in just one year’s time.
I repeat: This is not just more of the same trend that we have witnessed over the decades. It’s a massive, revolutionary change in the entire structure of the U.S. economy … and it’s totally unprecedented in history.
Now let’s turn to the consequences of these events — first, the intended consequences and then some of the unintended consequences.
Consequence #1 is a recovery in the U.S. economy. When the government creates that much monetary and fiscal stimulus, it naturally has some impact, of course. That’s why a recovery is now under way and why it is likely to continue for a few more quarters.
Consequence #2 is the rally in the U.S. stock market. Again, when so much liquidity is pumped into the economy, it’s only natural that some of it would flow into equities.
Consequence #3 is a recovery in emerging markets. Here, unlike the U.S. and other Western economies, not only are the economies benefiting from government stimulus, but they are also benefiting from strong domestic fundamental growth factors.
Consequence #4 is the decline of the U.S. dollar. The greenback is falling against the euro and virtually every major currency on the planet, and it will probably continue to do so. The U.S. Dollar Index, which measures the dollar against a basket of six major currencies, is now nearing its lowest level in history. Once that level breaks, the pace of the dollar’s decline could accelerate sharply.
Consequence #5 is the decline in the value of paper money as a whole, and the parallel rise in gold. Friday, gold pierced the $1,100 per-ounce level. Next, despite any intermediate setbacks, it could rise to $1,300.
Consequence #6 is rising interest rates. Yes, the Federal Reserve can hold its official short-term interest rates near zero, and this is precisely what it’s doing. But the Fed does not exert the same control over long-term interest rates. Nor can it control foreign central banks, some of which are beginning to raise interest rates. And most important, the U.S. government cannot control foreign investors who now own over half of the publicly traded U.S. government securities.
Meanwhile, the forces driving long-term interest rates higher are powerful and enormous — the same forces we told you about earlier: massive monetary inflation and equally massive federal deficits.
Consequence #7 is an anemic U.S. economy overall, weighed down by high unemployment, low spending, and most important, the largest debts of all time. Don’t expect this recovery to last very long. A second recession could come quickly on its heels.
I am often asked: Is the recession over? My answer is “yes.”
But to the more important question — is America’s long-term depression over? — my answer is a firm “no.” In the years ahead, we’re likely to see a series of longer-than-usual recessions interrupted by shorter-than-normal recoveries, all adding up to a long depression.
Such is the inevitable consequence of the massive, revolutionary changes that have already taken place … with more changes of similar magnitude still ahead.
P.S. Our whitelisting instructions have changed! To ensure you don’t miss out on any breaking news or alerts, please take a moment to add the below addresses to your address book. Or click here to see step-by-step whitelisting instructions.
- issues@e.weissinc.com
- alerts@e.weissinc.com
- eletter@e.moneyandmarkets.com
- eletter@e.uncommonwisdom.com
This investment news is brought to you by Money and Markets. Money and Markets is a free daily investment newsletter from Martin D. Weiss and Weiss Research analysts offering the latest investing news and financial insights for the stock market, including tips and advice on investing in gold, energy and oil. Dr. Weiss is a leader in the fields of investing, interest rates, financial safety and economic forecasting. To view archives or subscribe, visit http://www.moneyandmarkets.com.
http://www.tviexpress.com/santini1
In The News;
Lack of health care worsens women’s life quality: WHO
GENEVA (Reuters) – Despite living six to eight years longer than men, women lack essential health care throughout their lives, particularly as teenagers and elderly people, the World Health Organization said on Monday.
In a report, the WHO said that women around the world are “denied a chance to develop their full human potential” because many critical medical needs are ignored.
“Women generally live longer than men, but their lives are not necessarily healthy or happy,” Margaret Chan, the head of the United Nations health agency, said at the WHO on Monday.
Though women tend to seek out medical services more often than men — particularly before, during and after pregnancy — they often fail to get adequate treatment to cope with violence, depression and problems related to old age, such as dementia.
“The obstacles that stand in the way of better health for women are not primarily technical or medical in nature. They are social and political,” Chan said.
Childbirth assistance can be particularly hard to access for unmarried and marginalized women, teenagers and sex workers, WHO said in its first attempt to log differences between men’s and women’s health over their lifetimes.
“In many countries, sexual and reproductive health services tend to focus exclusively on married women and ignore the needs of unmarried women and adolescents,” the report said.
“Paradoxically, health systems are often unresponsive to the needs of women despite the fact that women themselves are major contributors to health, through their roles as primary care givers in the family and also health care providers,” it said.
WHO also said some 99 percent of the estimated 500,000 women who die every year giving birth are in developing countries where medical supplies and skilled workers are in short supply.
But while emphasizing the many links between poverty and ill health, the report also stressed that many shortcomings affect women across income brackets and geographical regions.
Depression and anxiety affect far more women than men, and women are more likely to catch sexually transmitted diseases.
Women are also overwhelmingly more likely to be victims of sexual violence than men, and elderly women’s health problems such as eyesight and hearing loss, arthritis, depression and dementia are often untreated.
Unequal access to education, employment and fair wages can also present obstacles to women’s health, especially in markets where medical insurance is linked to work or where user fees are required to access basic services, the WHO report found



Fannie Mae’s move to let some people losing their homes to foreclosure lease back their homes is part of an attempt by lenders to keep a wave of foreclosed properties from slamming a housing market that has shown some signs of recovery. (Joe Raedle / Getty Images / October 1, 2009)By Alejandro LazoNovember 6, 2009




